AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1045/084
*Corresponding Author: Rizwan Khalid, Professor, Departments of Surgery and Biomedical Engineering University of California Irvine.
Citation: R Khalid, M Hassaan, A Raza. (2021) Clinical Presentation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Lahore, Pakistan – A Single Center Study. Endocrinology and Disorders. 5(5): DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/084
Copyright: © 2021 Rizwan Khalid. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 09 August 2021 | Accepted: 21 August 2021 | Published: 30 August 2021
Keywords: primary hyperparathyroidism; calcium; parathyroid hormone
Aim: To assess different clinical presentations and outcomes of primary hyperparathyroidism in Pakistan.
Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Study Setting: East Surgical Ward, Mayo Hospital, Lahore.
Duration: 2011 to 2016
Introduction: PHPT is a common endocrine condition with a wide range of clinical manifestations differing according to geographic.
Discussion: The most common clinical presentation in our study was bone pains which were in contrast to the asymptomatic cases being most common manifestation in US and Western countries. 90% (n 36) of the patients had bony involvement while 47.5% (n 19) had renal involvement at the time of presentation.
Conclusion: Due to lack of routine biochemical screening tests in developing countries, primary hyperparathyroidism is detected late.
Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine condition which is manifested as elevated serum calcium levels with increased or unsuppressed serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels [1]. It is more prevalent in females i.e. 1:400 while being 1:1000 in males [2]. Most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism are asymptomatic with only few presented with classical signs and symptoms including bony and renal manifestations [2, 3]. The clinical presentation of PHPT may be atypical, ranging from normocalcemic PHPT to symptomatic hypercalcemia (parathyroid crisis) depending upon the severity of calcium disturbance [3].
Before 1970s, asymptomatic PHPT remained undiagnosed leading to introduction of biochemical screening tests including serum calcium level measurement [2, 4]. The classical features of PHPT i.e. bones, stones, abdominal moans and psychic groans, are common in developing countries [3]. In United States, biochemical screening results in detection of large number of asymptomatic patients, which is the most common presentation of PHPT [1-3].
A study was conducted by Castellano E et al in which clinical presentations was assessed in older age population [5]. There is no such study conducted in a developing country like Pakistan. It is important to assess the different clinical presentations and outcomes of PHPT in our country so that routine biochemical screening for serum calcium levels is implemented to facilitate early detection of asymptomatic patients.
This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in East Surgical Ward, Mayo Hospital, Lahore during 2011 to 2016. All the patients who underwent parathyroid gland surgery were evaluated for our study. Patients with age > 18 years and with serum calcium level > 11.3 mg/dl and serum PTH level > 55 pg/ml, both on 2 separate occasions at least 7 days apart in last 6 months, were included in our study. Patients with H/O thiazide diuretics or lithium intake, family H/O familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) or pregnancy/lactation were excluded from the study. A self-constructed questionnaire was filled. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 20. Qualitative variables like age and gender were represented as frequencies and percentages. Quantitative variables like serum calcium levels were represented as mean.
A total number of 40 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were included in our study. Table 1 represents the demographic characteristics which show that females were 85% (n 34) higher than males i.e. 15% (n 6). Majority of them were in 20-29 years age category i.e. 27% (n 11) , with 22.5% (n 9) in 50-59 years, 20% (n 8) in 30 -39 years, 10% (n 4) in 40-49 years, 10% (n 4) in60-69 years, 7.5% (n 3) in 10-19 years and 2.5% (n 1) in 70-79 years.
62.5% (n 25) were referred from orthopedic department, 20% (n 8) from medicine, 7.5 % (n 3) from urology, 5% (n 2) from maxillofacial, 2.5% (n 1) from neurology and 2.5% (n 1) from nephrology to our ward.As shown in table 3, 90% (n 36) of the patients presented with skeletal symptoms and 47.5% (n 19) were with renal manifestations while only 20% (n 8) of the patients had psychiatric issues at presentation.
In our study, the mean serum calcium level was 12.57 mg/dl (Normal: 8.6 – 10.3 mg/dl) while mean PTH level was 1511 pg/ml (Normal: 1.6 – 7.5 pg/ml) [6].
Among the surgeries done for PHPT in our study, unilateral focused parathyroidectomy, bilateral exploration and parathyroidectomy with sub- total thyroidectomy, bilateral exploration with parathyroidectomy and unilateral exploration, excision of tumor thyroid lobectomy and isthmusectomy was done in 87.5% (n 35), 7.5% (n 3), 2.5% (n1) and 2.5% (n 1) patients respectively.
Among the retrieved specimens, 95% (n 38) of them were solitary adenomas while 2.5% (n 1) were hyperplasia and 2.5% (n1) were carcinomas.
Previous studies show that primary hyperparathyroidism is commonly diagnosed on routine biochemical screening tests making asymptomatic PHPT the most common clinical presentation [1-3]. In our study, we have taken only the symptomatic patients as there is no routine biochemical screening present in developing countries like Pakistan. Like other studies, there was female predominance in our study with majority of the patients in 20-29 years of age [5, 6].
62.5% of the patients were referred from orthopedics to our ward showing that most of the patients had bony manifestations. The most common presentation in our study was bone pains i.e. 72.5% (n 29) which was comparable to study conducted by Reid LJ et al in which 27.5% of the patients presented with bone pains [6]. In contrast to our results, the common clinical manifestation in a study done by Grigorie D et al was renal involvement i.e. 51.7% [7].
The mean calcium level was 12.57 mg/dl in our study while it was slightly lower in previous studies being 11.2 mg/dl in study done by Castellano E et al and 11.3 mg/dl in that by Grigorie D et al. [5, 7].Our mean PTH level was 1511 pg/ml which much higher as compared to other studies [5-7].
87.5% (n 35) of the patients underwent focused unilateral parathyroidectomy. Histopathology revealed 95% (n 38), 2.5% (n 1) and 2.5% (n 1) of the specimens were unilateral adenoma, hyperplasia and carcinoma respectively, which was equivalent to the results shown in study by Grigorie D et al [7].
In developing countries like Pakistan, majority of the patients present late when primary hyperparathyroidism become symptomatic and patients develop debilitating features of bony and renal involvement. Like US and other western countries, routine biochemical screening tests should be implemented to aid in early detection and treatment of the disease.
The author (s) declare that there is no conflict of interest.
The author (s) received no specific funding for this study.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
